From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765923AbYD1G3r (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:29:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753918AbYD1G3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:29:38 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:50756 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753858AbYD1G3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:29:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:29:35 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Miller Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT]: Sparc Message-ID: <20080428062935.GA13876@infradead.org> References: <20080427.170139.242528272.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080427.170139.242528272.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 05:01:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Several fixes and cleanups: > > 1) Remove SunOS signal frame support, that Linux used for like > a month some 12 years ago :-) I added an assertion that checks > to make sure 32-bit processes request the newer style signal > frames, which I doubt will ever trigger since Jakub Jelinek > and myself are probably the only two people on the planet who > ever had such Linux binaries on their system :-) Is a WARN_ON the right check for user-triggerable behaviour? I think a normal rate-limited printk with a descriptive text would be better. > Getting rid of the EBUS layer is much hardware, and will require harder? :)