From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Packard, Keith" <keith.packard@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 17:08:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805251708.49038.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080506224240.GA18706@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:32:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Note that the "expected mapping type" errors remain the same both with
> > and without framebuffer console.
>
> The patch below plugs the mprotect hole and should eliminate the
> "expected mapping type" error messages. Can you check.
Hi,
My apologies for the very late reply. Unfortunately I've had no time for
work on kernel issues the last few weeks.
I have not specifically tested any of the proposed patches, but I can
confirm that the "expected mapping type" errors are gone with -rc2
and -rc3. Thanks a lot.
The artifacts are still there though and frequently even worse than
originally reported. I will open a bugzilla entry for that.
Cheers,
FJP
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-25 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 19:22 [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? Frans Pop
2008-05-02 19:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-02 20:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-02 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-02 22:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-04 7:10 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-04 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-04 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-05 16:55 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 17:00 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-05 17:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-05 18:56 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 15:57 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-05 17:32 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-05 17:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-05 18:59 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 19:04 ` fb layer & ioremap_wc Jesse Barnes
2008-06-13 16:42 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-06 22:42 ` [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-07 7:02 ` [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 19:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-07 23:23 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-09 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 20:05 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-09 20:09 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-09 20:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-09 22:11 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-09 22:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-10 6:19 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-10 6:29 ` Keith Packard
2008-05-10 5:45 ` Keith Packard
2008-05-07 22:36 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-25 15:08 ` Frans Pop [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805251708.49038.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=keith.packard@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).