From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757426AbYIIQ61@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757426AbYIIQ61 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:58:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754676AbYIIQ6S
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:58:18 -0400
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:54506 "EHLO
	vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752762AbYIIQ6R (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:58:17 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:58:12 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       ACPI mailing list <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
       "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [regression] Re: Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60
Message-ID: <20080909165812.GA25808@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20080908151058.GA1650@elf.ucw.cz> <20080908155457.GA30619@srcf.ucam.org> <20080909152859.GA1813@elf.ucw.cz> <20080909164254.GA25463@srcf.ucam.org> <20080909165558.GB1691@elf.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080909165558.GB1691@elf.ucw.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:55:58PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> It was same old X. New X fix that. But I still have two backlight devices...

Should be fixed in .28. Sorry about that, confusion over which DRM 
branches were getting merged meant it missed .27.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org