From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754725AbYJXJ1c (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751586AbYJXJ1V (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:21 -0400 Received: from merkurneu.hrz.uni-giessen.de ([134.176.2.3]:51965 "EHLO merkurneu.hrz.uni-giessen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbYJXJ1U (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:20 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 902 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:19 EDT To: Terleev Roman Subject: Re: PROBLEM: too much RX drop packets on kernel 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.x From: Marc Dietrich Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:12:00 +0200 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_hFZAJmbhAqeA5Ap" Message-Id: <200810241112.01255.marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner-Information: Passed JLUG virus check X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner: No virus found X-MailScanner-From: marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Boundary-00=_hFZAJmbhAqeA5Ap Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Terleev, On Friday 24 October 2008 10:00:07 Terleev Roman wrote: > hello, linux-kernel. > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > too much RX drop packets > > [2.] Full description of the problem/report: > "Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit > Ethernet controller" - network is up and working, but too much more drop > packets: > > working int: > #ifconfig eth0 > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1F:D0:5C:1A:5A > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:7323 errors:0 dropped:7564458177891 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:8388 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:688493 (672.3 KiB) TX bytes:5088993 (4.8 MiB) > Interrupt:251 Base address:0x4000 does the attached patch (from git-net) fix it? To NetDev: Is this already in a stable-branch? Marc --Boundary-00=_hFZAJmbhAqeA5Ap Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="utf-8"; name="0001-r8169-fix-RxMissed-register-access.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-r8169-fix-RxMissed-register-access.patch" =46rom 422f23adb15141fffbba4c2579b26c59fabc3537 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Francois Romieu Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:20:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] r8169: fix RxMissed register access =2D the register location is defined for the 8169 chipset only =2D only the lower 3 bytes of the register are valid Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu Cc: Edward Hsu =2D-- drivers/net/r8169.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c index 0f6f974..4190ee7 100644 =2D-- a/drivers/net/r8169.c +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c @@ -2099,8 +2099,6 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8168(struct net_device *dev) =20 RTL_R8(IntrMask); =20 =2D RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); =2D rtl_set_rx_mode(dev); =20 RTL_W8(ChipCmd, CmdTxEnb | CmdRxEnb); @@ -2143,8 +2141,6 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8101(struct net_device *dev) =20 RTL_R8(IntrMask); =20 =2D RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); =2D rtl_set_rx_mode(dev); =20 RTL_W8(ChipCmd, CmdTxEnb | CmdRxEnb); @@ -2922,6 +2918,17 @@ static int rtl8169_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, in= t budget) return work_done; } =20 +static void rtl8169_rx_missed(struct net_device *dev, void __iomem *ioaddr) +{ + struct rtl8169_private *tp =3D netdev_priv(dev); + + if (tp->mac_version > RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06) + return; + + dev->stats.rx_missed_errors +=3D (RTL_R32(RxMissed) & 0xffffff); + RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); +} + static void rtl8169_down(struct net_device *dev) { struct rtl8169_private *tp =3D netdev_priv(dev); @@ -2939,9 +2946,7 @@ core_down: =20 rtl8169_asic_down(ioaddr); =20 =2D /* Update the error counts. */ =2D dev->stats.rx_missed_errors +=3D RTL_R32(RxMissed); =2D RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); + rtl8169_rx_missed(dev, ioaddr); =20 spin_unlock_irq(&tp->lock); =20 @@ -3063,8 +3068,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats *rtl8169_get_stats(str= uct net_device *dev) =20 if (netif_running(dev)) { spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->lock, flags); =2D dev->stats.rx_missed_errors +=3D RTL_R32(RxMissed); =2D RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); + rtl8169_rx_missed(dev, ioaddr); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tp->lock, flags); } =20 @@ -3089,8 +3093,7 @@ static int rtl8169_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_m= essage_t state) =20 rtl8169_asic_down(ioaddr); =20 =2D dev->stats.rx_missed_errors +=3D RTL_R32(RxMissed); =2D RTL_W32(RxMissed, 0); + rtl8169_rx_missed(dev, ioaddr); =20 spin_unlock_irq(&tp->lock); =20 --Boundary-00=_hFZAJmbhAqeA5Ap--