From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] IA64: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:41:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081024144038A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
The block layer dropped the virtual merge feature
(b8b3e16cfe6435d961f6aaebcfd52a1ff2a988c5). BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY
definition is meaningless now (For IA64, BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY has been
meaningless for a long time since IA64 disables the virtual merge
feature).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h | 24 ------------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h
index 7f25750..0d9d16e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h
@@ -434,28 +434,4 @@ extern void memset_io(volatile void __iomem *s, int c, long n);
# endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-/*
- * Enabling BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY forces us to turn off I/O MMU bypassing. It is said that
- * BIO-level virtual merging can give up to 4% performance boost (not verified for ia64).
- * On the other hand, we know that I/O MMU bypassing gives ~8% performance improvement on
- * SPECweb-like workloads on zx1-based machines. Thus, for now we favor I/O MMU bypassing
- * over BIO-level virtual merging.
- */
-extern unsigned long ia64_max_iommu_merge_mask;
-#if 1
-#define BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY 0
-#else
-/*
- * It makes no sense at all to have this BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY macro here. Should be
- * replaced by dma_merge_mask() or something of that sort. Note: the only way
- * BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY is used is to mask off bits. Effectively, our definition gets
- * expanded into:
- *
- * addr & ((ia64_max_iommu_merge_mask + 1) - 1) == (addr & ia64_max_iommu_vmerge_mask)
- *
- * which is precisely what we want.
- */
-#define BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY (ia64_max_iommu_merge_mask + 1)
-#endif
-
#endif /* _ASM_IA64_IO_H */
--
1.5.4.2
reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081024144038A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).