From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752651AbYJ0LoZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:44:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751939AbYJ0LoO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:44:14 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46100 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753425AbYJ0LoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:44:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:43:48 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Pavel Machek , Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Jack Steiner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Richard Purdie , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SGI X86 UV: Provide a System Activity Indicator driver Message-ID: <20081027114348.GC5631@elte.hu> References: <4901AF28.4070606@sgi.com> <20081024120103.GD1680@elf.ucw.cz> <20081024120544.GA9812@elte.hu> <4901BF30.3090708@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4901BF30.3090708@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > Also, this is only on a UV system, I'm not introducing any overhead > for any other x86_64 systems. true, but it sets a bad example that others might follow - and it's not hard to fix anyway. Ingo