From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756004AbZBWWNU (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:13:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753444AbZBWWNJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:13:09 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42025 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250AbZBWWNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:13:06 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Larry Finger Subject: Re: [Bug #12609] v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:13:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Alan Cox , Mikael Pettersson , Sergei Shtylyov References: <200902070058.26539.rjw@sisk.pl> <49A2CD3B.4090703@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <49A2CD3B.4090703@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902232313.01391.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 23 February 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday 07 February 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Thursday 05 February 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12609 > >>>>> Subject : v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression > >>>>> Submitter : Larry Finger > >>>>> Date : 2009-01-23 23:52 (13 days old) > >>>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123275478111406&w=4 > >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=4 > >>>>> Handled-By : Mikael Pettersson > >>>>> Hugh Dickins > >>>>> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=2 > >>>> Yes, this does still need to be listed. My initial patch for it was > >>>> not enough, but I think the three patches necessary have all now been > >>>> posted (though Sergei may rewrite mine). I'm expecting Alan to gather > >>>> them together and send them in due course, but I believe he's occupied > >>>> with other stuff just at the moment. > >> I still have the problem as of 2.6.29-rc3-00634-g9be260a > > > > The problem was fixed as of 2.6.29-rc5-00168-gba95fd4 with commit d1b3525. At > least for my system, the regression is cleared. It's already been closed, thanks for the confirmation. Rafael