linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:53:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228205329.GB4254@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227203431.D1E697CB@kernel>

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:34:31PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> We have set up sane defaults for how filesystems should
> be checkpointed.  However, as usual in the VFS, there
> are specialized places that will always need an ability
> to override these defaults.
> 
> This adds a new 'file_operations' function for
> checkpointing a file.  I did this under the assumption
> that we should have a dirt-simple way to make something
> (un)checkpointable that fits in with current code.
> 
> As you can see in the /dev/null patch in a second, all
> that we have to do to make something like /dev/null
> supported is add a single "generic" f_op entry.

Please don't do the fallback to allow checkpointing without file
operations.  We've never had luck with these fallbacks, and I'm
in the process of getting of the last default file operation (llseek,
which has a very bad default) currently.

Incidentally that should also allow you to get rid of the per-fs flag
by just checking for the presence of the operation to check if
checkpointing is allowed.

Also the double-use of the op seem not very nice to me.  Is there any
real life use case were you would have the operation on a file but
sometimes not allow checkpoiting?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-28 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 20:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/8] kill '_data' in cr_hdr_fd_data name Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] breakout fdinfo sprintf() into its own function Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:56   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-27 21:23     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] create fs flags to mark c/r supported fs's Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:16   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 21:20     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] file c/r: expose functions to query fs support Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 21:24     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:32       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  1:33   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28  2:51     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 20:53   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-02-28 21:37     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 15:19       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:05     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-03 13:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-20 21:13         ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-20 21:30           ` Oren Laadan
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mark /dev/null and zero as checkpointable Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] add c/r info to fdinfo Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:57   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-01 17:00     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-04 23:41     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 19:43   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 13:37   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 15:56     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 15:59     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 16:27       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:22         ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 17:30           ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:44             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:58               ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:13               ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:35                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-05  8:20                 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-02 16:28       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090228205329.GB4254@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).