From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755731AbZCCTpe (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:45:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754043AbZCCTpW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:45:22 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:49538 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753998AbZCCTpU (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:45:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:45:13 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Kara Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Natalie Protasevich , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Message-ID: <20090303194513.GA10548@infradead.org> References: <20090303193609.GE27178@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090303193609.GE27178@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:36:10PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hi, > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12551 > > Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/c0d0, sector 87435720 > > Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt > > Date : 2009-01-27 06:51 (28 days old) > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497 > > Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1 > > Submitter : Christoph Hellwig > > Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (43 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4 > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe > I've just noticed that the above two reports are probably the same bug... > Just that we don't duplicate the effort. At least on the XFS side it's fixed now. The block layer gets the initial detection right without warning, and a patch to fix the unconditional cache flush on unmount is on it's way.