From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756118AbZCDLsM (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:48:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755607AbZCDLrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:47:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54208 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756890AbZCDLru (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:47:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:47:30 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stefan Richter Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Mike Galbraith , James Bottomley , Jan Engelhardt , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects Message-ID: <20090304114730.GA6736@elte.hu> References: <1236119990.24019.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303230323.GA21644@elte.hu> <49ADBE29.4040706@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090303234834.GA13389@elte.hu> <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> <49AE32B5.9040603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090304111235.GA14593@elte.hu> <49AE65EE.5020605@s5r6.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49AE65EE.5020605@s5r6.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stefan Richter wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Stefan Richter wrote: > >> > As I said, I recommend that people do not receive those off-topic > >> > patches by default, only on demand. (Because I sometimes work with -rt > >> > users.) > >> > >> And as I said before, I missed to remove the patch before pushing out > >> the -rt tree. So I really do not need repeated advise on how to do my > >> work. > > > > yeah. I dont think Stefan ever maintained a high-volume generic > > tree before. Kibitzing from the sidelines always makes it seem > > so easy ;-) > > You could also take this "I recommend..." not as advice how to > do your work but rather as a /user request/ regarding the > outcome of your work. Oh, so you use -tip? I didnt know that ... never got any feedback from you i guess it's trouble-free. So you like its stability? Ingo