From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758666AbZCUOSt (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:18:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754196AbZCUOSk (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:18:40 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40544 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914AbZCUOSj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:18:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:18:00 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Sam Ravnborg , LKML , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: work around distcc/icecc madness Message-ID: <20090321141800.GB22029@elte.hu> References: <20090320092234.GA3792@elte.hu> <20090320185917.GB6224@elte.hu> <20090320193334.GA19501@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i dont do anything weird. i use: > > > > CROSS_COMPILE='distcc > > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.2.2-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-' > > > > host compiler was never supposed to be the same in terms of > > capability as target compiler. > > Hmm. Then something else is going wrong. The kernel build system > checks the target compiler not the host one. > > Is your distcc setup using the same compilers on all your machines > in the build cluster ? yes - i have versions hardcoded via absolute pathnames like above, and each distcc node has the exact same layout as above. (and it's hard to mess up explicit versions like that) I'll try to reproduce it once more and see what's going on. Ingo