From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: memcg needs may_swap (Re: [patch] vmscan: rename sc.may_swap to may_unmap)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:42:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090331104237.e689f279.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360903301826w6429720es8ceb361cfc088b1@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:26:17 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 3be6157..00ea4a1 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ struct scan_control {
> > /* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
> > int may_unmap;
> >
> > + /* Can pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
> > + int may_swap;
> > +
>
> Sorry for too late response.
> I don't know memcg well.
>
> The memcg managed to use may_swap well with global page reclaim until now.
> I think that was because may_swap can represent both meaning.
> Do we need each variables really ?
>
> How about using union variable ?
or Just removing one of them ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
>
> struct scan_control {
> /* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
> unsigned long nr_scanned;
> ...
> union {
> int may_swap; /* memcg: Cap pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
> int may_unmap /* global: Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
> };
>
>
>
> > /* This context's SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. If freeing memory for
> > * suspend, we effectively ignore SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
> > * In this context, it doesn't matter that we scan the
> > @@ -1379,7 +1382,7 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> > struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> >
> > /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
> > - if (nr_swap_pages <= 0) {
> > + if (!sc->may_swap || (nr_swap_pages <= 0)) {
> > percent[0] = 0;
> > percent[1] = 100;
> > return;
> > @@ -1695,6 +1698,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> > .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> > .swap_cluster_max = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > .may_unmap = 1,
> > + .may_swap = 1,
> > .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> > .order = order,
> > .mem_cgroup = NULL,
> > @@ -1714,6 +1718,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> > .may_unmap = 1,
> > + .may_swap = 1,
> > .swap_cluster_max = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > .swappiness = swappiness,
> > .order = 0,
> > @@ -1723,7 +1728,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> > struct zonelist *zonelist;
> >
> > if (noswap)
> > - sc.may_unmap = 0;
> > + sc.may_swap = 0;
> >
> > sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
> > (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> > @@ -1763,6 +1768,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order)
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> > .may_unmap = 1,
> > + .may_swap = 1,
> > .swap_cluster_max = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> > .order = order,
> > @@ -2109,6 +2115,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages)
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> > .may_unmap = 0,
> > + .may_swap = 1,
> > .swap_cluster_max = nr_pages,
> > .may_writepage = 1,
> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> > @@ -2289,6 +2296,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
> > .may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
> > + .may_swap = 1,
> > .swap_cluster_max = max_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
> > SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
> > .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kinds regards,
> Minchan Kim
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 3:11 [PATCH 0/3] [PATCH 0/3] swsusp: shrink file cache first Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] swsusp: clean up shrink_all_zones() Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 3:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 3:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] swsusp: dont fiddle with swappiness Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 3:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 3:11 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] swsusp: shrink file cache first Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 3:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 4:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 5:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 12:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-06 13:35 ` MinChan Kim
2009-02-06 17:15 ` MinChan Kim
2009-02-06 23:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-09 19:43 ` [patch] vmscan: rename sc.may_swap to may_unmap Johannes Weiner
2009-02-09 23:02 ` MinChan Kim
2009-02-10 10:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-27 6:19 ` [PATCH] vmscan: memcg needs may_swap (Re: [patch] vmscan: rename sc.may_swap to may_unmap) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-27 6:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-29 23:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-31 0:18 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-03-31 1:26 ` Minchan Kim
2009-03-31 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-03-31 1:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-01 4:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-01 5:08 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-04-01 9:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-04-01 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-01 9:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-04-01 9:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-01 16:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-31 1:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-02-06 21:00 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] swsusp: shrink file cache first Andrew Morton
2009-02-06 23:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-07 17:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-08 20:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-07 4:41 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-02-07 16:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-07 21:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-02-27 13:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-01 10:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:03 ` MinChan Kim
2009-02-06 10:06 ` MinChan Kim
2009-02-06 11:50 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090331104237.e689f279.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).