From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937331AbZDIXnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:43:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755611AbZDIXnM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:43:12 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:44056 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754522AbZDIXnL (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:43:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:39:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: matthieu.castet@parrot.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, tarmigan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][Checkstack] Don't censor output Message-Id: <20090409163948.b39e40cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090406211146.GA10231@logfs.org> References: <20090406211146.GA10231@logfs.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:11:46 +0200 J__rn Engel wrote: > Subject: [PATCH][Checkstack] Don't censor output Please use the form subsytem-identifier: what-i-did-to-it so [patch] checkstack: don't censor output would suit here. > Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:11:46 +0200 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > For reasons that neither Arnd nor I can remember, the s390 port of > checkstack happened to ignore stack frames below 300 and above 10000 > bytes. Later on the same effect - arguably a bug - was copied into the > arm, ia64, mips and sh64 ports. > > Fixing it also makes the regular expressions shorter and simpler. > > scripts/checkstack.pl | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > --- debuggerhead/scripts/checkstack.pl~checkstack 2008-03-05 12:14:05.000000000 +0100 > +++ debuggerhead/scripts/checkstack.pl 2008-11-04 20:38:08.000000000 +0100 The patch fails to apply, yet nobody has changed checkstack.pl in ages. I think you're tricking me.