From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753137AbZEYMMf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 08:12:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751824AbZEYMM1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 08:12:27 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35175 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751746AbZEYMM1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 08:12:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:12:25 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: Ingo Molnar , Yinghai Lu , Rusty Russell , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeff Garzik , Alexander Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , cl@linux-foundation.org, mpm@selenic.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes Message-ID: <20090525121225.GF24071@wotan.suse.de> References: <4A199327.5030503@kernel.org> <20090525025353.GA2580@elte.hu> <4A1A2261.1000504@kernel.org> <20090525051521.GC23032@elte.hu> <20090525112504.GB24071@wotan.suse.de> <84144f020905250437x585e66a2oc1124a4f1f43059d@mail.gmail.com> <20090525114127.GE24071@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:04:20PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 02:37:59PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > The bootmem allocations of course are required because some hashes may > > > > need to be larger than MAX_ORDER without using vmalloc. > > > > > > > > kmem_cache_init (and mem_init, partially) sets up the kernel memory > > > > allocators... > > > > > > Which comment are you talking about? The "setup kernel memory > > > allocators" one? Yeah, I should probably move it couple of lines down. > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Yes, just that one. > > And oh, we probably want to do this too while at it. Nick? > > >From b211497261670ff6f9af6b8b0fab429e848ccc87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pekka Enberg > Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:01:35 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] vmalloc: use kzalloc() instead of alloc_bootmem() > > We can call vmalloc_init() after kmem_cache_init() and use kzalloc() instead of > the bootmem allocator when initializing vmalloc data structures. > > Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg > --- > init/main.c | 2 +- > mm/vmalloc.c | 3 +-- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c > index fb0e004..766194c 100644 > --- a/init/main.c > +++ b/init/main.c > @@ -585,13 +585,13 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void) > __stop___param - __start___param, > &unknown_bootoption); > pidhash_init(); > - vmalloc_init(); > vfs_caches_init_early(); > /* > * Set up kernel memory allocators > */ > mem_init(); > kmem_cache_init(); > + vmalloc_init(); vmalloc won't work fully without slab and page allocators anyway, so this is conceptually a bugfix I think. Ack.