linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: liqin.chen@sunplusct.com
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:37:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906091837.28897.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF47CBE0C5.C2291ED8-ON482575CF.00287989-482575CF.0028F312@sunplusct.com>

On Monday 08 June 2009, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com wrote:
> Thanks Arnd, our MIS help me solve the download problem.
> 
> > Feel free to base you code on top of asm-generic.git#next, but tell me
> > when you intend to do that so I can warn you of possibly rebases.
> 
> Last week, I had updated score code base on asm-generic.git#next.
> 
> and I will apply a account on kernel.org, But before I get the account,
> can you let score code merge in asm-generic.git?

I can take your patches and apply them to a new branch in my tree
if that helps. I hope that Linus can pull my tree early in the
merge window so your architecture port and the microblaze changes
based on it can also get in soon.

I guess for the new architecture, it makes sense to combine all
your patches into a single changeset in git, since they don't
make sense until you have the complete set, and your changeset
comments are rather boring so far anyway.

Can you write a few paragraphs of text about your architecture
for the initial changeset comment? I think it would be good
to permanently store some facts in there, e.g. in which ways
the architecture is different from others, where to get a
toolchain and what kinds of hardware exist for it.

I'll go through the patches once more and see if I find anything
that should still be changed before the code goes in, but
from a brief look, the code looks pretty good now.

	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OFBE107210.5CC63061-ON482575C7.00354DAD-482575C7.00372848@sunplusct.com>
2009-05-31 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-08  7:23   ` liqin.chen
2009-06-09 16:37     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-06-10  2:14       ` liqin.chen
2009-04-08  7:18 liqin.chen
2009-04-10  6:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14  8:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-05-31  9:59   ` liqin.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906091837.28897.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).