From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754356Ab0ARL3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:29:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754168Ab0ARL3g (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:29:36 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:47744 "EHLO mail-qy0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754117Ab0ARL3e (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:29:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=nXqEopCgQO48PTIKNTCwJkRRQVMapIaz+m1GXONIOyGLwmLOb4dAVsAPFHOaXrILmy QFKwNR3ZZAszPZLrtz1gCPT5uhTDV2KhbUAhvjtUKDHqFthO9ncp3d8EcCO3oWJWDflQ hex+0oJRpduCvyWtmc5Kzc2b1L1zWsVjudXxw= Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:26:22 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Florian Mickler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Message-ID: <20100118112619.GA8387@redhat.com> References: <20100116174821.GA18306@redhat.com> <201001162257.16277.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100117123218.GA3182@redhat.com> <84144f021001170618g708a7c14ob1b222ab1cbdaa20@mail.gmail.com> <20100117161726.5752b181@schatten.dmk.lab> <84144f021001170843s67afae24oaabf09e9b13af8db@mail.gmail.com> <84144f021001170923o30d37becw57ebbd780f63b69e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84144f021001170923o30d37becw57ebbd780f63b69e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hi Florian, > > > > (Please don't trim the cc list.) > > > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > >> on which side of the merge? linus or drm? > >> i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side) > >> so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation? > > > > Like I said, don't read too much into the results but the current > > situation looks like the regression happened _after_ 2.6.32 but before > > any of the DRM code was merged to 2.6.33-rc1. I don't think that makes > > much sense which is why I'm back to testing 2.6.32 more to see if the > > bug is there already but just harder to trigger for whatever reason. > > OK, confirmed. I can see the "flashing" bug with 2.6.32 as well. It > just takes more time to trigger than in 2.6.33-rc1. I am going back to > test 2.6.31 now. Well, I've been using 2.6.32 day to day since it came out and never saw this bug there. What do you do to trigger this bug? -- MST