From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755487Ab0ASIla (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:41:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755465Ab0ASIl3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:41:29 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]:59045 "EHLO mail-fx0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755023Ab0ASIl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:41:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=TQlvjLmIw98haY5W4r9Ss1guliAEVGP4TXQ3jZTOdM8RkSZXPjkUdCDDzC6BpCwK44 pxrX0oB7FL3HkC7xlorZ2C2QqBEViKKgPEAnfh4IA06rJxpGD/B1hfKIrdxzDKeGquCx VnvrymKpcqlu66trqjKWLYUheh4MLbBUUM3sY= Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:41:20 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Michael Breuer Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, flyboy@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit() Message-ID: <20100119084120.GA6366@ff.dom.local> References: <20100118073018.GA6270@ff.dom.local> <4B548C6B.10607@majjas.com> <20100118204658.GC3157@del.dom.local> <4B54CB0D.5070604@majjas.com> <20100118212516.GE3157@del.dom.local> <4B54D50C.90608@majjas.com> <20100118220814.GG3157@del.dom.local> <20100118221747.GH3157@del.dom.local> <4B54E4EF.8080602@majjas.com> <4B554730.6090000@majjas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B554730.6090000@majjas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:46:24AM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote: > So net-net, as far as my TX packet loss issue, sky2 is in the clear. If > something on the linux side should be informing the switch about > something then there may still be an issue. If the wifi router should be > doing something differently, then it's unfortunately likely a 2.4.37 > kernel issue (That's what dd-wrt is using). IMHO until there is no proof from a sniffer or some regs dumps the switch and the router are more suspicious than your NIC or linux box. Then debugging these other things isn't so much interesting from my POV ;-) Anyway, if you only want to get it working (instead of debugging), it seems you might try moving the dhcp server to the router or maybe even using two separate servers with their pools - unless I missed something in your config. Jarek P.