From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758053Ab0BRLv6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:51:58 -0500 Received: from s15228384.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.30.177]:53050 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757996Ab0BRLvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:51:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:51:55 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Michal Marek , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kbuild , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , LKML , Jamie Lokier , Roland Dreier , Al Viro , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Brian Gerst Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Message-ID: <20100218115155.GA20473@aftab> References: <4B6FDAED.9060204@zytor.com> <20100208095945.GA14740@a1.tnic> <20100211172424.GB19779@aftab> <4B743F7D.3090605@zytor.com> <20100212170649.GC3114@aftab> <4B758FC0.1020600@zytor.com> <20100212174751.GD3114@aftab> <4B75A66A.70005@zytor.com> <4B7BF5D6.3030701@suse.cz> <1266490310.26719.185.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1266490310.26719.185.camel@laptop> Organization: Advanced Micro Devices =?iso-8859-1?Q?GmbH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str=2E_34=2C_85609_Dornach_bei_M=FC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nchen=2C_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer=3A_Thomas_M=2E_McCoy=2C_Giuli?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ano_Meroni=2C_Andrew_Bowd=2C_Sitz=3A_Dornach=2C_Gemeinde_A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?schheim=2C_Landkreis_M=FCnchen=2C_Registergericht_M=FCnche?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2C?= HRB Nr. 43632 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:51:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I guess one way to achieve that is to create a arch/x86/lib/hweight.c > that includes lib/hweight.c and give the x86 one special compile flags > and not build the lib on. That's what I thought initially too but that won't fly because the lib/hweight.c helpers have to be inlined into arch/x86/lib/hweight.c so that gcc can take care of the clobbered registers. Otherwise, it just a "call __sw_hweightXX" that gets issued into asm. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. - Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating Systems Research Center