From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932235Ab0DAXVA (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:21:00 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50696 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758983Ab0DAXUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:20:40 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [Regression, post-rc2] Commit a5ee4eb7541 breaks OpenGL on RS780 (was: Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc3) Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:23:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rc3-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Airlie , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux PCI , Clemens Ladisch , Alex Deucher , stable@kernel.org, Greg KH References: <20100401154847.20e9c8b8@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: <20100401154847.20e9c8b8@jbarnes-piketon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004020123.55974.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 02 April 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:29:23 -0700 (PDT) > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > OK, I've verified that partial revert (below) is sufficient. > > > > Hmm. Through the DRM merge I just did, this area actually conflicted, and > > the resolved version is now > > > > if ((rdev->family >= CHIP_RV380) && > > (!(rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_IGP))) { > > > > which presumably also fixes your issue? > > > > [ Side note: somebody in the DRM tree seems to be way too used to LISP, > > and thinks that adding parenthesis always improves the code ;-] > > > > However, I do suspect that we should probably revert the quirk regardless > > as being useless (ie it probably was related to those IGP chips that > > apparently don't do MSI anyway). > > > > So the patch that reverts the quirk by Clemens (to replace it with > > disabling MSI entirely when the AMD NB doesn't accept them) seems to be a > > good idea regardless, since it's apparently not just about gfx. Jesse? > > Yeah, that sounds fine. I can include it in my next pull req or you > can just pick it up directly. Not exactly that one, please, it's missing a quirk for the affected system. I've just sent a corrected version, here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90275/ Rafael