linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] vmscan: Update isolated page counters outside of main path in shrink_inactive_list()
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:35:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100416143521.GH19264@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100416115315.27AA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:19:00PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > When shrink_inactive_list() isolates pages, it updates a number of
> > counters using temporary variables to gather them. These consume stack
> > and it's in the main path that calls ->writepage(). This patch moves the
> > accounting updates outside of the main path to reduce stack usage.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmscan.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 2c22c83..4225319 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1061,7 +1061,8 @@ static unsigned long clear_active_flags(struct list_head *page_list,
> >  			ClearPageActive(page);
> >  			nr_active++;
> >  		}
> > -		count[lru]++;
> > +		if (count)
> > +			count[lru]++;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return nr_active;
> > @@ -1141,12 +1142,13 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
> >   * TODO: Try merging with migrations version of putback_lru_pages
> >   */
> >  static noinline void putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone,
> > -				struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat,
> > +				struct scan_control *sc,
> >  				unsigned long nr_anon, unsigned long nr_file,
> >   				struct list_head *page_list)
> >  {
> >  	struct page *page;
> >  	struct pagevec pvec;
> > +	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> 
> Seems unrelated change here.
> Otherwise looks good.
> 

It was needed somewhat otherwise the split in accounting looked odd. It
could be done as two patches but it felt trickier to review.

>  - kosaki
> >  
> >  	pagevec_init(&pvec, 1);
> >  
> > @@ -1185,6 +1187,37 @@ static noinline void putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone,
> >  	pagevec_release(&pvec);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static noinline void update_isolated_counts(struct zone *zone, 
> > +					struct scan_control *sc,
> > +					unsigned long *nr_anon,
> > +					unsigned long *nr_file,
> > +					struct list_head *isolated_list)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long nr_active;
> > +	unsigned int count[NR_LRU_LISTS] = { 0, };
> > +	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> > +
> > +	nr_active = clear_active_flags(isolated_list, count);
> > +	__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
> > +
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE,
> > +			      -count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE]);
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE,
> > +			      -count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]);
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON,
> > +			      -count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON]);
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON,
> > +			      -count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON]);
> > +
> > +	*nr_anon = count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
> > +	*nr_file = count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, *nr_anon);
> > +	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, *nr_file);
> > +
> > +	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += *nr_anon;
> > +	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += *nr_file;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
> >   * of reclaimed pages
> > @@ -1196,11 +1229,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >  	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> >  	unsigned long nr_scanned;
> >  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> > -	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> >  	int lumpy_reclaim = 0;
> >  	unsigned long nr_taken;
> >  	unsigned long nr_active;
> > -	unsigned int count[NR_LRU_LISTS] = { 0, };
> >  	unsigned long nr_anon;
> >  	unsigned long nr_file;
> >  
> > @@ -1244,25 +1275,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, count);
> > -	__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
> > -
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE,
> > -			      -count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE]);
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE,
> > -			      -count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]);
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON,
> > -			      -count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON]);
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON,
> > -			      -count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON]);
> > -
> > -	nr_anon = count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
> > -	nr_file = count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, nr_anon);
> > -	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, nr_file);
> > -
> > -	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += nr_anon;
> > -	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += nr_file;
> > +	update_isolated_counts(zone, sc, &nr_anon, &nr_file, &page_list);
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >  
> > @@ -1281,7 +1294,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >  		 * The attempt at page out may have made some
> >  		 * of the pages active, mark them inactive again.
> >  		 */
> > -		nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, count);
> > +		nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, NULL);
> >  		count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
> >  
> >  		nr_reclaimed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc,
> > @@ -1293,7 +1306,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >  		__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_STEAL, nr_reclaimed);
> >  	__count_zone_vm_events(PGSTEAL, zone, nr_reclaimed);
> >  
> > -	putback_lru_pages(zone, reclaim_stat, nr_anon, nr_file, &page_list);
> > +	putback_lru_pages(zone, sc, nr_anon, nr_file, &page_list);
> >  	return nr_reclaimed;
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.6.5
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-15 17:21 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce stack usage used by page reclaim V1 Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] vmscan: kill prev_priority completely Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] vmscan: move priority variable into scan_control Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:48   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-26 10:23     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-28  2:39       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] vmscan: simplify shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] vmscan: Remove useless loop at end of do_try_to_free_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 22:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary vars in do_try_to_free_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] vmscan: Split shrink_zone to reduce stack usage Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  4:23   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16 14:27     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  6:26   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 23:14   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary variables in shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:51   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 23:03     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-26 11:21       ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-28  2:51         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  4:27   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16  6:30   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 23:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_page_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  7:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:34     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] vmscan: Update isolated page counters outside of main path in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 11:19   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:35     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-04-16 23:34   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-16 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce stack usage used by page reclaim V1 Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100416143521.GH19264@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).