From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758221Ab0DPSOl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:14:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:59566 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757610Ab0DPSOj (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:14:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=UkZxOZGn5BN+2JRWr+K4hOvCET43wYoXudoKrx0QTME8NTmqS+KFPuTmGSkDIdaa1G CKuah2u2YNGsBIAZs/OhiT72uIp0Pl/H6Aomb198pPn9LUPwZs7G926xLZ0y7hP5++NF UgpQCKnWSfSA25S7IWBEYSrbv5vZG9UkqN0qg= Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:14:40 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Chase Douglas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Stop tracing on a schedule bug Message-ID: <20100416181438.GJ5162@nowhere> References: <1271262016-18650-1-git-send-email-chase.douglas@canonical.com> <1271262016-18650-3-git-send-email-chase.douglas@canonical.com> <20100415210357.GG5069@nowhere> <1271436413.1934.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1271436413.1934.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:46:53PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 21:01 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > > 2) tracing off can be done via filters on functions and/or events > > > already - so I doubt that the tracing_off_event(level) is necessary > > > at all. > > > > > > schedule_bug() definitely deserves a separate trace_schedule_bug() > > > event which can be used to stop the tracer by already existing > > > functionality. > > > > Steven said he would be fine with a separate TRACE_EVENT_ macro > > for the schedule bug if needed, but I'm not sure we need to go that > > far. If it's configurable through debugfs at run time then it serves > > my purpose. Unless you feel we should have finer grained control > > specifically for scheduling while atomic bugs, I'll just leave it as > > TRACE_EVENT_WARN. > > I actually like Thomas's idea better. I need to add the "stop trace on > event" functionality, and we can insert trace events for bugs, and not > have this whole "stop tracing here" functions. Instead we could just add > tracepoints and have a way to pick and choose where to stop tracing. > > add a: > > include/trace/events/errors.h > > #define TRACE_SYSTEM errors > > TRACE_EVENT(sched_bug, ....) > > etc, > Looks good. > When I get back home, I'll add this functionality to stop tracing on > events. Perhaps I'll even add "TRACE_SUB_SYSTEM" so in the events > directory, we can have sub layers: > > events/errors/BUG/... > events/errors/WARNING/... I agree this could be nice. I'm thinking about the printk all around the kernel that can be represented as trace events with sub-sub-systems that could be file paths of the kernel. I just hope we can find a way to do this that won't break tools.