From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752954Ab0EaLat (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2010 07:30:49 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34743 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753059Ab0EaLar (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2010 07:30:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100531.043056.258120791.davem@davemloft.net> To: fthain@telegraphics.com.au Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, joe@perches.com, p_gortmaker@yahoo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup, take 4 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: fthain@telegraphics.com.au Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:07:09 +1000 (EST) > Apparently David now wants me to submit this again -- > > if (ei_debug) > pr_debug(...) > > David, if that code is acceptable, please let me know. The only thing I care about is at the moment that you don't do something that ends up dropping the pr_fmt prefix. The pr_fmt define at the beginning of the driver is for nothing if we end up adding exceptions that end up eliding it for no good reason. And that's what your patch was doing.