From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757224Ab0GNOZn (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:25:43 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:57133 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757108Ab0GNOZl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:25:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:25:21 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Tejun Heo , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Message-ID: <20100714142521.GA19289@fancy-poultry.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Lameter , Tejun Heo , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> <20100710195621.GA13720@fancy-poultry.org> <20100712163900.GA8513@fancy-poultry.org> <20100713135650.GA6444@fancy-poultry.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Accept-Language: no,dk,se,en,de Organization: private site X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0xA9353F12 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: C67E 9A93 1033 DF8A 9321 9F90 DC39 B8C3 A935 3F12 X-OpenPGP-URL: http://www.fritha.org/htd.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20+20100619 (GNU/Linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:lW4MeLbWDA1hWjbETui0fbSCBR2rdWqkjD0tyHos9I3 r+DZepuYUdqoppApD1qJUjPhSplfQFMeG9ICuRrpN3MN0gwIGm y+alszvaHvtTKHMvMSxmesEhkERoEChwnUhmk+XItGx5LB5yYj pzUiGnZ7K14LNy3Xmhi6ireKKt5NcnBoE5Bb6Rcfb2oQ7PK6wJ a2jUvX7eaVgrnhgRxADNg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.07.2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to > increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream? Yes ,it's plain vanilla 2.6.35-rc4/-rc5 from kernel.org. > Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON. I first bumped it up to 24k, but that was obviously not enough, so I commented out the BUILD_BUG_ON which triggers the build error. Now It builds fine, and I'll do some testing. Thanks, Heinz.