linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@codeaurora.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Israel Schlesinger <israels@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add warnings for use of mdelay()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:44:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728094414.GA3586@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100727121610.64b38cfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:32:54 -0700
> Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 07/27/2010 10:31 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:11:11 -0700
> > > Israel Schlesinger <israels@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> mdelay is a busy-wait loop which is wasteful. If at all possible,
> > >> callers should use msleep instead of mdelay.
> > >>
> > >> The only time mdelay is really appropriate is in atomic context,
> > >> however, delays of 1ms+ in atomic context are rather expensive, so
> > >> a warning for this case is probably appropriate as well to encourage
> > >> people to move such expensive delays outside of atomic context
> > > 
> > > Once upon a time, msleep(1) would sleep for 20ms, while mdelay(1) gave
> > > a 1ms delay.  My patch to fix msleep() at that time didn't get in due
> > > to concerns about the cost of using hrtimers.  Perhaps msleep() has
> > > gotten better, but, if not, actually getting a 1ms delay remains a
> > > valid reason for using mdelay() instead IMO.  It made a difference of a
> > > few seconds at open time for a driver I was doing at the time.
> > > 
> > > jon
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> > Check out the recently added usleep in -tip, and the checkpatch patch
> > pending in my queue that fixes that case (I'll send in a few hours ;) )
> > 
> 
> The message should point people at usleep_range(), I'd suggest.  It's a
> more power-friendly way of sleeping.
> 
> That assumes that the below patch gets merged - the people who handle
> timer-related things are presently, err, asleep.
> 
> 
> From: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@codeaurora.org>
> 
> usleep[_range] are finer precision implementations of msleep and are
> designed to be drop-in replacements for udelay where a precise sleep /
> busy-wait is unnecessary.  They also allow an easy interface to specify
> slack when a precise (ish) wakeup is unnecessary to help minimize wakeups
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/delay.h |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/timer.c        |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -puN include/linux/delay.h~timers-add-usleep-timer include/linux/delay.h
> --- a/include/linux/delay.h~timers-add-usleep-timer
> +++ a/include/linux/delay.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ extern unsigned long lpj_fine;
>  void calibrate_delay(void);
>  void msleep(unsigned int msecs);
>  unsigned long msleep_interruptible(unsigned int msecs);
> +void usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max);
> +
> +static inline void usleep(unsigned long usecs)
> +{
> +	usleep_range(usecs, usecs);
> +}
>  
>  static inline void ssleep(unsigned int seconds)
>  {
> diff -puN kernel/timer.c~timers-add-usleep-timer kernel/timer.c
> --- a/kernel/timer.c~timers-add-usleep-timer
> +++ a/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -1763,3 +1763,25 @@ unsigned long msleep_interruptible(unsig
>  }
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(msleep_interruptible);
> +
> +static int __sched do_usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> +{
> +	ktime_t kmin;
> +	unsigned long delta;
> +
> +	kmin = ktime_set(0, min * NSEC_PER_USEC);
> +	delta = max - min;

If this interface is taking a min and max in micro-seconds, then does
not the delta need also to be converted to nano-seconds?

schedule_hrtimeout_range seems to call hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns
which seems to generally be called with 'delta_ns'.  Something like:

delta = (max - min) * NSEC_PER_USEC;

> +	return schedule_hrtimeout_range(&kmin, delta, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * usleep_range - Drop in replacement for udelay where wakeup is flexible
> + * @min: Minimum time in usecs to sleep
> + * @max: Maximum time in usecs to sleep
> + */
> +void usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> +{
> +	__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	do_usleep_range(min, max);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(usleep_range);

-apw

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-28  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-27 17:11 [PATCH] checkpatch: Add warnings for use of mdelay() Israel Schlesinger
2010-07-27 17:22 ` Joe Perches
2010-07-27 17:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-07-27 17:32   ` Patrick Pannuto
2010-07-27 19:16     ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-28  9:44       ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2018-07-04 18:18 Prakruthi Deepak Heragu
2018-07-04 18:30 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-05  8:19   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-07-06  5:49     ` Julia Lawall
2018-07-07 12:09       ` Jia-Ju Bai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100728094414.GA3586@shadowen.org \
    --to=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=israels@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ppannuto@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).