From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752858Ab0IUWkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:40:22 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:51283 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461Ab0IUWkV (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:40:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:56:50 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Hans J. Koch" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] uio: Support 2^MINOR_BITS minors Message-ID: <20100921215650.GA18673@kroah.com> References: <20100921210809.GA28026@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:38:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:36:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > register_chrdev limits uio devices to 256 minor numbers which causes > > > > problems on one system I have with 384+ uio devices. So instead set > > > > UIO_MAX_DEVICES to the maximum number of minors and use > > > > alloc_chrdev_region to reserve the uio minors. > > > > > > > > The final result is that the code works the same but the uio driver now > > > > supports any minor the idr allocator comes up with. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman > > > > > > One minor nit: > > > > > > > + result = alloc_chrdev_region(&uio_dev, 0, UIO_MAX_DEVICES, name); > > > > + if (result) > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > return result; > > > > Wait, why? It's the exact came code, as out does: > > > > out: > > return result; > > > > and you need that line due to the code above it. So I say leave it. > > s/goto out/return result/g > > Gotos which end up in a single line "return foo;" are pretty pointless. Ok, fair enough, but it's not a big deal, right? thanks, greg k-h