linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Márton Németh" <nm127@freemail.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:02:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100926130230.GA5378@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009251755.57690.arnd@arndb.de>

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 05:55:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 24 September 2010 15:22:22 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > From: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
> > 
> > The patch solves the following warnings message when CONFIG_COMPAT
> > is not defined:
> > 
> > fs/autofs/root.c:30: warning: ‘autofs_root_compat_ioctl’ declared ‘static’ but never defined
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> My initial reaction was to put these into my bkl/vfs tree, but then I noticed
> that they are against a 2.6.36 bug. Who's taking care of getting them upstream?
> 
> - Ian (maintainer)
> - Arnd (who wrote the broken patch to start with)
> - Frederic (who pushed the broken patch to Linus)
> - Andrew (took them into -mm)
> 
> I don't care either way, just trying to make sure it gets there and we don't
> all submit the same patch simultaneously.
> 
> The current state is annoying but harmless, so I could also just add the
> patches to my 2.6.37 queue, which already has autofs patches for the BKL.
> 
> 	Arnd



I think Andrew has taken the autofs one, as I've received an mmotm notification.
I don't know about the autofs4 one though.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-26 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-24 13:22 [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-24 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] autofs4: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] autofs: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-26 13:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-09-27 19:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-04  8:26     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-30 20:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-09-30 20:20   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-30 20:37     ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100926130230.GA5378@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm127@freemail.hu \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).