From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751823Ab0JBV7x (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:59:53 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:38052 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202Ab0JBV7v (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:59:51 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Ted Ts'o" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bug #19062] Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:58:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-rc6-rjw+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Cesar Eduardo Barros , Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe References: <20101002165433.GL21129@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20101002165433.GL21129@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010022358.35972.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, October 02, 2010, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19062 > > Subject : Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs > > Submitter : Cesar Eduardo Barros > > Date : 2010-09-23 0:54 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C9AA546.6050201@cesarb.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128520328929595&w=2 > > Note: I'm seeing this warning (Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi) > when I moved from 2.6.36-rc3 to 2.6.36-rc6, using ext4 as a root > partition, and running mke2fs and e2fsck on ext2, ext3, and ext4 file > systems. So I'm seeing this as a known regression from rc3 to rc6. > Maybe it's different bug with ext4, but in any case, it's highly > annoying. Thanks for the info. I wonder who should see this report. Andrew, do you know whose area that is?