linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, h.mitake@gmail.com,
	Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench: add --prefault option for causing page faults before benchmark
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:29:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101110092945.GD12238@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288976785-15857-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>


* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:

> This patch adds --prefault option to perf bench mem memcpy.
> If user specify this option to perf bench mem memcpy, overhead of
> page faults will be removed from the score of memcpy().
> 
> Example of usage:
> | % ./perf bench mem memcpy -l 500MB
> | # Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
> | # Copying 500MB Bytes from 0x7fc036749010 to 0x7fc055b4a010 ...
> |
> |      628.526821 MB/Sec
> | mitake@X201i:~/linux/.../tools/perf% ./perf bench mem memcpy -l 500MB --prefault
> | # Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
> | # Copying 500MB Bytes from 0x7ff1b45e2010 to 0x7ff1d39e3010 ...
> |
> |        4.849256 GB/Sec

Ok, looks rather useful.

We are rather close to being able to apply these bits. We need a resolution for the 
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S details. The ugliest are these kinds of #ifdefs:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
 .Lmemcpy_e:
        .previous
+#endif

What happens if we keep that label in place?

This:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
 ENTRY(__memcpy)
 ENTRY(memcpy)
        CFI_STARTPROC
+#else
+	.globl  memcpy_x86_64_unrolled
+memcpy_x86_64_unrolled:
+#endif

Could be removed if you defined an ENTRY() macro in perf, right?

This:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
+
        CFI_ENDPROC
 ENDPROC(memcpy)
 ENDPROC(__memcpy)

Could be solved by defining ENDPROC()/etc. macros in perf, right?

We could remove this #ifdef:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
+
 #include <linux/linkage.h>

 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/dwarf2.h>

+#endif /* PERF_BENCH */

if you added empty linkage.h, cpufeature.h and dwarf2.h files as 
tools/perf/util/include/linux/linkage.h, tools/perf/util/include/asm/cpufeature.h.

That linkage.h file could even contain a short perf version of the ENTRY() macro, 
etc.

That way we can avoid having to touch arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S altogether.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-10  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-05 17:06 [PATCH] perf bench: add --prefault option for causing page faults before benchmark Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-10  9:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-11-15 15:58   ` Hitoshi Mitake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101110092945.GD12238@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=h.mitake@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ling.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).