linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 01/28] fs: d_validate fixes
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:09:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116142028.254946611@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101116140900.039761100@kernel.dk

[-- Attachment #1: fs-d_validate-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2394 bytes --]

d_validate has been broken for a long time.

kmem_ptr_validate does not guarantee that a pointer can be dereferenced
if it can go away at any time. Even rcu_read_lock doesn't help, because
the pointer might be queued in RCU callbacks but not executed yet.

So the parent cannot be checked, nor the name hashed. The dentry pointer
can not be touched until it can be verified under lock. Hashing simply
cannot be used.

Instead, verify the parent/child relationship by traversing parent's
d_child list. It's slow, but only ncpfs and the destaged smbfs care
about it, at this point.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>

---
 fs/dcache.c |   25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c	2010-11-17 00:11:48.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c	2010-11-17 01:05:52.000000000 +1100
@@ -1483,41 +1483,30 @@ struct dentry *d_hash_and_lookup(struct
 }
 
 /**
- * d_validate - verify dentry provided from insecure source
+ * d_validate - verify dentry provided from insecure source (deprecated)
  * @dentry: The dentry alleged to be valid child of @dparent
  * @dparent: The parent dentry (known to be valid)
  *
  * An insecure source has sent us a dentry, here we verify it and dget() it.
  * This is used by ncpfs in its readdir implementation.
  * Zero is returned in the dentry is invalid.
+ *
+ * This function is slow for big directories, and deprecated, do not use it.
  */
- 
 int d_validate(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *dparent)
 {
-	struct hlist_head *base;
-	struct hlist_node *lhp;
-
-	/* Check whether the ptr might be valid at all.. */
-	if (!kmem_ptr_validate(dentry_cache, dentry))
-		goto out;
-
-	if (dentry->d_parent != dparent)
-		goto out;
+	struct dentry *child;
 
 	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
-	base = d_hash(dparent, dentry->d_name.hash);
-	hlist_for_each(lhp,base) { 
-		/* hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() not required for d_hash list
-		 * as it is parsed under dcache_lock
-		 */
-		if (dentry == hlist_entry(lhp, struct dentry, d_hash)) {
+	list_for_each_entry(child, &dparent->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {
+		if (dentry == child) {
 			__dget_locked(dentry);
 			spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 			return 1;
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-out:
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_validate);



  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-16 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-16 14:09 [patch 00/28] [rfc] dcache scaling part 1 Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-17 10:44   ` [patch 01/28] fs: d_validate fixes Andi Kleen
2010-11-18 20:51   ` David Miller
2010-11-18 20:59     ` David Miller
2010-11-19  5:05       ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-19  5:01     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 02/28] kernel: kmem_ptr_validate considered harmful Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 03/28] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 04/28] fs: change d_delete semantics Nick Piggin
2010-11-17  0:16   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 05/28] cifs: dont overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 06/28] jfs: " Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 07/28] fs: change d_compare for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-17  0:44   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 08/28] fs: change d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-17  0:50   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 09/28] hostfs: simplify locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 10/28] fs: dcache scale hash Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 11/28] fs: dcache scale lru Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 12/28] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 13/28] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 14/28] fs: dcache scale subdirs Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 15/28] fs: scale inode alias list Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 16/28] fs: Use rename lock and RCU for multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:42   ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 17/28] fs: increase d_name lock coverage Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 18/28] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 19/28] fs: dcache avoid starvation in dcache multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 20/28] fs: dcache reduce dput locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 21/28] fs: dcache reduce locking in d_alloc Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 22/28] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 23/28] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 24/28] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 25/28] fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 26/28] fs: reduce dcache_inode_lock width in lru scanning Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 27/28] fs: use RCU in shrink_dentry_list to reduce lock nesting Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 28/28] fs: consolidate dentry kill sequence Nick Piggin
2010-11-17  2:12 ` [patch 00/28] [rfc] dcache scaling part 1 Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-17 11:19   ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 12:01     ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-19 19:43 ` Tim Pepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101116142028.254946611@kernel.dk \
    --to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).