From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758653Ab0KPO5U (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:57:20 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:57670 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755751Ab0KPO5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:57:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:55:51 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Florian Mickler Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jesper Juhl , David Rientjes , KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Ying Han , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@web.de>, Mandeep Singh Baines , "Figo.zhang" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series Message-ID: <20101116145551.49c47df5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101116140341.42561c84@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <20101115093410.BEFD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101114181905.bc5b44f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101115113238.BF06.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <34565.1289866395@localhost> <20101116110310.1502de2a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20101116140341.42561c84@schatten.dmk.lab> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > How does one mark it apropriately? > The commit 51b1bd2 (oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable, see below) > added it to feature-removal-schedule.txt, a patch for > Documentation/ABI has also been provided in the meantime, if i'm not > mistaken. Yes - so why is it spewing crap, annoying users and trying to irritate application authors. It's not 2012 yet.