From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933274Ab0KQA4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:56:01 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([72.52.115.56]:57859 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932265Ab0KQA4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:56:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:55:56 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: Joe Perches Cc: Mark Brown , Florian Mickler , Jiri Kosina , Andrew Morton , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem maintainer preference tool Message-Id: <20101116165556.3ee8e236.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <1289951875.28741.261.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab> <20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20101116203522.65240b18@schatten.dmk.lab> <20101116195530.GA7523@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20101116122102.86e7e0b9.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20101116232258.GC24623@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20101116152835.b0ab571c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1289951875.28741.261.camel@Joe-Laptop> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:57:55 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:28 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:46:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower. > > > > > Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging) > > > > Case usually doesn't matter to most of us. > > > Given that we're working in case sensitive languages here it's probably > > > safe to assume that a reasonable proportion of people will care; being > > > reasonably consistent with existing practice for the subsystem seems > > > sensible. > > Greg takes patches that say STAGING or Staging or staging. > > Greg seems to rewrite patch subjects and is inconsistent > about case, so he might be doing that by hand. > > > DaveM takes patches that say net: or netdev: or network: or NET: > > DaveM doesn't appear to be choosy about patch subject lines. > He seems to take any sensible patch and as far as I know he > doesn't edit the subject lines. He does reject inferior > patches outright. > > > The sound maintainers take patches that say sound: or alsa: or ALSA: > > The sound maintainers seem to rewrite patch subjects on an > ad-hoc basis. OK, I can accept your summary. However, I can't tell that we are making any progress. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***