From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756709Ab0KQLKM (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:10:12 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:39541 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753217Ab0KQLKK (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:10:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:08:22 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Baruch Siach Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Greg KH , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alex Gershgorin , Indan Zupancic Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] drivers/misc: Altera active serial implementation Message-ID: <20101117110822.478fdd46@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101117053251.GA26928@jasper.tkos.co.il> References: <4CE0FE71.6000303@suse.cz> <20101115100838.GA3649@jasper.tkos.co.il> <4CE10B32.8090705@suse.cz> <20101116110444.2f0cabd9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4CE28299.30907@suse.cz> <20101117053251.GA26928@jasper.tkos.co.il> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:32:51 +0200 Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Jiri, Alan, > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 11/16/2010 12:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Sixteen devices is way too many for drivers/misc - it only has 256 total > > > and only half of those are dynamic. > > > > Seconded. (And it's a quarter, not even a half like I already wrote.) > > If I reduce the maximal number of devices to 4, will it make any difference? I > don't mind even having a limit of 2 by default, as long as a simple define > change is enough to raise this limit. No look you can need more than two, its not a one off special device it doesn't use the misc minor space. Allocate some dynamic device space. Alan