From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752329Ab0KWHRU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:17:20 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:37374 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752151Ab0KWHRC (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:17:02 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Linus Torvalds , LKML , David Rientjes , Ying Han , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@web.de>, Mandeep Singh Baines , "Figo.zhang" In-Reply-To: <20101115113238.BF06.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20101114181905.bc5b44f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101115113238.BF06.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20101123161036.7BA5.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:59 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If you still have a question, please ask me. maybe I can answer all of > your question. Zero question? If so, I'll resend the revert to linus. Actually, I don't tend hear the shouting. They aren't discussion. It's only crappy shout. Googlers have to think why no person agree their claim. ZERO. even though >20 people discussed with them. DavidR seems to continue to make flame. But I don't care. He have to learn making flame don't solve ANYTHING. And they have to learn correct discussion way and which is different of discusstion and shouting. and why we have to learn userland workload and have to avoid any breakage. I'm angry googlers frequently break kernel and frequently ignore userland claim.