From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752714Ab1ACSrT (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:47:19 -0500 Received: from ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.214]:50388 "EHLO ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751284Ab1ACSrS (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:47:18 -0500 From: "Henrik Rydberg" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 19:45:33 +0100 To: Kevin McNeely Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , David Brown , Trilok Soni , Samuel Ortiz , Eric Miao , Mike Frysinger , Alan Cox , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v3 1/3] 1/3 Touchscreen: Cypress TTSP G3 MTDEV Core Driver Message-ID: <20110103184533.GA7035@polaris.bitmath.org> References: <1293650268-1561-1-git-send-email-kev@cypress.com> <20101231115323.GA9709@polaris.bitmath.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: 83.248.200.95 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1PZpPW-0004g9-CZ. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net 1PZpPW-0004g9-CZ b071ae6b636695623e744385334b151b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > If the in-kernel tracking module was in place, would you consider > > switching to the slots protocol? > > Hi Henrik, can you please clarify? Should I remove MTDEV from the patch > title? Let me start over - is there a way to reliably track contacts from the device? If yes, the question is whether you would consider switching to type B right away. If no, the question was whether you would consider a switch to type B if there was a in-kernel tracking module to use. I understand if there are other reasons to stay with type A, I am mostly curious. And perhaps MTDEV is a bit misplaced in the title, unless it has something to do with the device. Thanks, Henrik