From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754922Ab1AUJ1w (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:27:52 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:61059 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754900Ab1AUJ1t (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:27:49 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=j651S3qdhG/oIID7hWZA9nK9ujiCtGp91wnIEaZU2EAodiriEKyQFQrZl52jAEhWMW LlJEbSQB3SDMO7uR1rsdbZuket3eRQ5FW1X3MtBu35AI2gNul5jdr2T7zIfAiNy1GTCp KgFMugUqUpYk7ylxogL6lFBBQ/t1ZCrCSInOU= Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:27:39 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Trilok Soni Cc: Kevin McNeely , David Brown , Samuel Ortiz , Eric Miao , Mike Frysinger , Henrik Rydberg , Alan Cox , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v4 3/3] 3/3 spi: Cypress TTSP G3 SPI Device Driver Message-ID: <20110121092739.GB24214@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1294188847-24728-3-git-send-email-kev@cypress.com> <20110112184550.GB9168@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D38182B.60803@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D38182B.60803@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:40:35PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 1/13/2011 12:32 AM, Kevin McNeely wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > Thank you for your review. > > > > Will the existing patches get into the current merge? > > > > Can I revisit this discussion as part of our plan to provide a Protocol > > B driver? > > > > Thanks and best regards, > > Kevin > > > > Any updates on Kevin's question here? > Hi Trilok, Kevin, Ah, sorry, was not feeling well last week and lost track of this driver. No, I am sorry, bit the driver is not quite ready to be merged. Aside of SPI abort/timeout issues we also have cyttsp_close() implementation busted (once you close device you lose irq) and bunch of other things I need to look over. I also have concern about having protocol A now and upgrading to protocol B: clients that only understand protocol A will get broken at A->B transition. I think we should consider implementing B right away for mainline (no, I do not want A/B config options). Sorry for being slow with doing full review... Thanks. -- Dmitry