From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755728Ab1BRDy0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:54:26 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:57871 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641Ab1BRDyX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:54:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:54:11 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Michal Marek Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-Id: <20110218145411.24bf7ad7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20110218094754.0436a60a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20110131154259.dca1f7e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110217144743.2db26b27.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4D5D201A.8090304@suse.cz> <20110217150200.GA32177@sepie.suse.cz> <20110218094754.0436a60a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__18_Feb_2011_14_54_11_+1100_lcTy8DMOXhEwQz=6" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__18_Feb_2011_14_54_11_+1100_lcTy8DMOXhEwQz=6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michal, On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:47:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:02:00 +0100 Michal Marek wrote: > > > > > _Maybe_ we could work around it by letting fixdep remove the actual > > > source file from the list of dependencies in the .cmd file. The > > > dependency on the .c / .S / whatever file is given by the Makefiles, = the > > > .cmd file is only needed for additional dependencies on headers. Let's > > > see what else breaks then ;). > >=20 > > It seems to work for me. Can you try the patch below? It needs to be > > applied before merging 9599ec0 to have any effect. >=20 > Thanks, I will apply this as a fix on top of Linus' tree before I merge > anything else. It looks simple enough that Linus may take it as a fix > right now. Better to convince ourselves first, though, right? That patch fixed the problem for me and has caused no obvious problems. Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__18_Feb_2011_14_54_11_+1100_lcTy8DMOXhEwQz=6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNXe1jAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsfkYH+wRmp2/MD0HNeOqXddVSF/yw zR6hyaovNE/R1kOv2CtaBKVfNRMP15uI816Z8pJKvBXVRXF/bSd/LvsbppjUf3Aq 65NDhX4OWxiIFWesHcvBjwAumIO58ZRle2qvjT33y8u7SNrxKKQpWDJkoQ9AGR22 pJdbtce9MpBEaOugr7sRlJm84zqICsRy7UJLtbUOeIKdLc6Mf4jvz/fK71ZDyUEg 5rIEaQ7GNwQloTs4RkxKhLax8/B0dCGMcZmbC6cK+RPMuSnEiwYJLxSAcaYgeNj/ +0QJK/zkc2x98t8oaWXMsfPxRWqYI9pWy/mnrX//zBlCJWKR7wTG3YvWP3xjElY= =Ky1R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__18_Feb_2011_14_54_11_+1100_lcTy8DMOXhEwQz=6--