From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754250Ab1CEUju (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:39:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64905 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752669Ab1CEUjs (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:39:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 21:30:40 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , linux-mm , pageexec@freemail.hu, Solar Designer , Eugene Teo , Brad Spengler , Roland McGrath , Milton Miller , Linus Torvalds Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] exec: unify native/compat code Message-ID: <20110305203040.GA7546@redhat.com> References: <20110302162650.GA26810@redhat.com> <20110302162712.GB26810@redhat.com> <20110303114952.B94B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110303154706.GA22560@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/03, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> I _personally_ don't like "conditional". Its name is based on code logic. > >> It's unclear what mean "conditional". From data strucuture view, It is > >> "opaque userland pointer". > > > > I agree with any naming, just suggest a better name ;) > > Maybe just "struct user_arg_ptr" or something? OK, nothing else was suggessted, I assume Kosaki agrees. So rename conditional_ptr to user_arg_ptr. Also rename get_user_ptr() to get_user_arg_ptr(). It was suggested to use the same "user_arg_ptr" for this helper too, but this is not grep-friendly. As for get_ in the name... Well, I can redo again ;) But this matches get_user() and this is all what this helper does. Otherwise unchanged. Oleg.