From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753507Ab1CRLNg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:13:36 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:42627 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752850Ab1CRLN3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:13:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:13:19 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Linus Torvalds , Tony Lindgren , David Brown , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window Message-ID: <20110318111319.GB27124@pengutronix.de> References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com> <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Russell, On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:15:12AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:50:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The pure amount of crazy churn is annoying in itself, > > but when I then get these "independent" pull requests from four > > different people, and they touch the same files, that indicates that > > something is wrong. > > I have already complained to Uwe and Sascha about the IMX/MXC conflicts. > It already struck me that there's something seriously wrong at > pengutronix.com as both Uwe and Sascha work in the same area, yet don't > coordinate their efforts. It seems to me that Uwe is completely > independent of everyone else. I feel blamed wrongly here. My part of the "crazy churn" in v2.6.38..$todayslinus/master is that I touched drivers/net/Kconfig[1] and arch/arm/mach-mxs/gpio.c[2]. The former went in via the net tree; the latter via Russell's tree with Sascha's Ack. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think this was the correct thing to do. I don't know how that qualifies as "completely independent of everyone else". IMHO the cooperation between Sascha and me works fine. In fact nearly all[3] of my patches that touch imx related things under arch/arm/ go in via Sascha's tree. Best regards Uwe [1] 085e79e (net/fec: consolidate all i.MX options to CONFIG_ARM) [2] bf0c111 (ARM: 6744/1: mxs: irq_data conversion) [3] Some exceptions I found are: bf0c111 ARM: 6744/1: mxs: irq_data conversion 4df772d ARM: 6322/1: imx/pca100: Fix name of spi platform data 868003c ARM: 6280/1: imx: Fix build failure when including without All of these are OK IMHO. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |