Hi,

Just some simple comments.

Does having this patch first in the series break APM idle?

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:02:27 +0530 Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> index 8d12878..17b7101 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static inline void play_dead(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +extern void cpuidle_idle_call(void);

Put this declaration in a header file and include that header file here
and in the file that defines that function.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/