From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757760Ab1CaNym (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:54:42 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:58226 "EHLO
	moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757711Ab1CaNyl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:54:41 -0400
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:54:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103302155270.22418@localhost6.localdomain6> <1301569200.2828.42.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1301569200.2828.42.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201103311554.25863.arnd@arndb.de>
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XOxzKHbQwAYs2YShzxQwOcuk604lraRFDrOKrMcYxTA
 f1+/6V1THL/rngMvdt7H1e0II2SmvWL3Gpt4HL7vBYPrLQkBSW
 /gpbRk2OdE+H4M4ANdHPpcq6Dk1+XTR2Rtu9VkxAZ22R0tWfQG
 YG+3uHAzqs/K+Ub1h1+boEvzZJj0pqjzbiOlktE8EqHcl70jXR
 rhJpkXeATwuGxbq0S2eHQ==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 31 March 2011, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 23:10 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The only problem is to find a person, who is willing to do that, has
> > enough experience, broad shoulders and a strong accepted voice. Not to
> > talk about finding someone who is willing to pay a large enough
> > compensation for pain and suffering. 
> 
> If I understand correctly, this is exactly what Linaro would need to do.

Absolutely. Getting the work done that each of the SoC vendors needs but
none of them would do on their own is the main reason why Linaro is there,
so if we can agree what needs to be done, I'm sure we can find someone
to do it.

	Arnd