From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751682Ab1DEIoG (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:44:06 -0400 Received: from smtp204.alice.it ([82.57.200.100]:60128 "EHLO smtp204.alice.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095Ab1DEIoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:44:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:43:47 +0200 From: Antonio Ospite To: Grant Likely Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Ribeiro , David Brownell , Chris Ball , Ernst Schwab , Sonic Zhang , Linus Walleij , openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework Message-Id: <20110405104347.0f93ab97.ospite@studenti.unina.it> In-Reply-To: <20110405030543.GC29522@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1300733202-27316-1-git-send-email-ospite@studenti.unina.it> <20110404115631.67b1f317.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <20110405030543.GC29522@ponder.secretlab.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.24.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: z*RaLf`X<@C75u6Ig9}{oW$H;1_\2t5)({*|jhM/Vb;]yA5\I~93>J<_`<4)A{':UrE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__5_Apr_2011_10_43_47_+0200_z7N73p8uiIR.ADUz" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__5_Apr_2011_10_43_47_+0200_z7N73p8uiIR.ADUz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:05:43 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 > > Antonio Ospite wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator fra= mework to=20 > > > the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups = to make=20 > > > the fourth one more straightforward. > > >=20 > > > Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions = about it. > > > > >=20 > > Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend > > it? >=20 > Not a bad idea. It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch, > not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits. >=20 Grant you were on Cc from the start so you should have the patches somewhere; please tell me if you don't. I'd avoid resending if not strictly necessary. Regards, Antonio --=20 Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? --Signature=_Tue__5_Apr_2011_10_43_47_+0200_z7N73p8uiIR.ADUz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2a1kMACgkQ5xr2akVTsAHgCwCeLlslXpMUNWY1y3U2oGqF2IM9 EoIAoJwgDQ7vYXZulTip4xWMQ31NVVaE =3yV6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__5_Apr_2011_10_43_47_+0200_z7N73p8uiIR.ADUz--