From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:56:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
> implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 0:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile & OMAP1 Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).