linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:17:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429201701.GA13166@x4.trippels.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104291250480.18728@trent.utfs.org>

On 2011.04.29 at 12:58 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 at 09:37, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Did you read the email that pointed to CONFIG_TINY_RCU as the
> > ptotential source of the problem? Can you change to CONFIG_TREE_RCU
> > and see if the problem goes away?
> 
> Tried with TREE_RCU, unfortunately the problem persists. However, the OOM 
> messages did not make it to the disk this time. Syslog continued to work 
> until 11:51 (local time), the slabinfo-8-TREE_RCU.txt file was written to 
> until 11:57, the machine was already unusable at that point. At 12:07 I 
> took a "screenshot" and then powercycled the machine:
> 
>   http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/
>   (The files marked with -8 are the current ones)
> 
> Btw, the xfs filesystem I'm du'ing over is still mounted with "noatime".
> 
> Any ideas? Patches to try?

I could be the hrtimer bug again. Would you try to reproduce the issue
with this patch applied?
http://git.us.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commit;h=ce31332d3c77532d6ea97ddcb475a2b02dd358b4

-- 
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-22  1:57 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks Christian Kujau
2011-04-22  2:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-22  3:03   ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 17:41   ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 18:46     ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 22:47       ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-24 23:46 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-25  5:51   ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25  7:19     ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-26 15:14       ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-27  2:26       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27  7:46         ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-27 10:28           ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 23:16             ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-27 23:56               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-28 17:30             ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-28 23:37               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-29 17:32                 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 19:58                 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 20:17                   ` Markus Trippelsdorf [this message]
2011-04-29 20:20                     ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 20:21                       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-30  0:17                     ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-01  8:01                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02  4:59                         ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 12:19                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 19:59                             ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03  0:51                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03  4:04                                 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03  6:36                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 20:53                                 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04  0:46                                   ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04  1:51                                     ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04  7:36                                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 11:12                                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 19:10                                         ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 23:15                                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05  2:07                                             ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02  9:26                         ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 12:38                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-25  8:02   ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25  9:50     ` Christian Kujau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110429201701.GA13166@x4.trippels.de \
    --to=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).