linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:49:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110526094905.536ca3f1@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011E2157D6@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, 25 May 2011 19:08:27 -0700, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jean Delvare [mailto:khali@linux-fr.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:54 PM
> > To: Andi Kleen
> > Cc: x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andi Kleen;
> > jbeulich@novell.com; Yu, Fenghua
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data
> > v2
> > 
> > Hi Andi,
> > 
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011 12:32:28 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> > > the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> > > revision from cpu_data instead
> > 
> > Where is this available? Not upstream yet, apparently. I get a build
> > failure here.
> > 
> 
> This is one of three patches. Cpu_data is defined in the first patch. You need to get the other two to test them.

OK, thanks. This is (build-)tested now.

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

Andi, do you plan to merge this in 2.6.40 or later?

-- 
Jean Delvare

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-26  7:39   ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 20:53   ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-26  2:08     ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-26  7:49       ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-05-25 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 20:06   ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 21:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-25 23:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-26  7:33 ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 11:46   ` Jean Delvare
2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110526094905.536ca3f1@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).