From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932390Ab1GEM2d (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:28:33 -0400
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:55149 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932359Ab1GEM2c (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:28:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:28:00 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
        Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@linaro.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
        Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 0/8] Contiguous Memory Allocator
Message-ID: <20110705122800.GC8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1309851710-3828-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <201107051407.17249.arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201107051407.17249.arnd@arndb.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I hope
> > that I've managed to resolve all the items discussed during the Memory
> > Management summit at Linaro Meeting in Budapest and pointed later on
> > mailing lists. The goal is to integrate it as tight as possible with
> > other kernel subsystems (like memory management and dma-mapping) and
> > finally merge to mainline.
> 
> You have certainly addressed all of my concerns, this looks really good now!
> 
> Andrew, can you add this to your -mm tree? What's your opinion on the
> current state, do you think this is ready for merging in 3.1 or would
> you want to have more reviews from core memory management people?

See my other mails.  It is not ready for mainline.