From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754550Ab1GGIGJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 04:06:09 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:57742 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754143Ab1GGIGC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 04:06:02 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v8] ARM: Add basic architecture support for VIA/WonderMedia 85xx SoC's Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:05:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-rc1nosema+; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com, Alexey Charkov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Eric Miao , "Uwe =?iso-8859-1?q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=" , Albin Tonnerre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1289147348-31969-1-git-send-email-alchark@gmail.com> <201107070954.00419.arnd@arndb.de> <20110707075954.GF8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110707075954.GF8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107071005.15497.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:8YQpW5q3VYuvcWCh9ryVpA/9+z1CeEC+wwwgS6UOm/4 fVHMHYQE8KntIo/7Hhw2h44dPh/3U5EOmMoJ8TAE0mGfd9I4gh rYncgXRWLD2u2NoupSwJw37mP3qaKjZnKCMwWuJVu+CxKS8HyX X9R/7SZdWZOzrFxtu6mpwlaQuMVR/Ir1i8XHP/ZQrPoUz2k2g9 oVyeGPzYurisHciOKSMxQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 07 July 2011 09:59:54 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Actually, we did discuss this when I first reviewed your patches. FWIW, > > WM8505, WM8510 and VT8500 don't seem to have PCI, but VT8430 has PCI, > > according to the data sheet and the patch provided by VIA. > > > > What made this a little hard to understand is the way that VIA provided > > an emulated PCI bus even on those platforms that didn't have the hardware, > > apparently because it didn't occur to them to add platform device > > support to the network driver (via velocity, iirc). They just faked a > > configuration space for the USB and network devices to make them work > > with the regular PCI drivers. > > Ok, so it can use the default value I've created for IO_SPACE_LIMIT > based on whether CONFIG_PCI is enabled or not. > Yes, correct. Arnd