From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755061Ab1G0UTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:19:43 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37553 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754589Ab1G0UTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:19:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:19:04 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: "Koul, Vinod" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "'Grant Likely'" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20110727201904.GA30198@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110727120826.ea1227276707790e162dee18@canb.auug.org.au> <1311736331.1536.45.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <438BB0150E931F4B9CE701519A4463010871EAC8BD@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438BB0150E931F4B9CE701519A4463010871EAC8BD@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:55:44PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:08 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Vinod, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in > > > drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c (called drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c in the sleav-dma > > > tree) between commit 083be3f05371 ("spi/pl022: initialize burstsize from > > > FIFO trigger level") from Linus' tree and commit 001b0585ff16 ("Improve > > > slave/cyclic DMA engine documentation") from the slave-dma tree. > > > > > > I fixed it up (see below) anc acn carry the fix as necessary. > > > > The correct fix would be: > > > > diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c > > index eba88c7,99e7880..0000000 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c > > @@@ -910,11 -908,11 +910,9 @@@ static int configure_dma(struct pl022 * > > { > > struct dma_slave_config rx_conf = { > > .src_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase), > > + .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE, > > }; > > struct dma_slave_config tx_conf = { > > .dst_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase), > > .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE, > > - .dst_maxburst = pl022->vendor->fifodepth >> 1, > > }; > > unsigned int pages; > > int ret; > > > Grant, Russell, > Can you please ack this fix before I apply in my tree to resolve this conflict I don't see why I need to - my documentation patch should only be touching Documentation/dmaengine.txt, not drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c. So it really should not be causing a conflict in this file.