From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751501Ab1HFGw1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:52:27 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:48027 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750924Ab1HFGwY (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:52:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:51:22 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Borislav Petkov , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Having perf use libparsevent.a Message-ID: <20110806065122.GC13220@elte.hu> References: <20110805205921.909038487@goodmis.org> <20110805212409.GA21114@elte.hu> <1312592488.18583.215.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1312592488.18583.215.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.9 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.9 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0001] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > Ingo, I was trying to do as you said, but to do so would require a > lot of restructuring of the perf code base. I started talking with > Arnaldo, as he's doing a lot of the work in the tools/perf code, > and he's the one that suggested that I do it this way. It made > things a lot easier. Could you guys please talk some more and clear it up? There's absolutely no technical reason why tools/perf/lib/ (or tools/perf/libperf/) should be harder than tools/lib/. Thanks, Ingo