From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756011Ab1KNTbP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:31:15 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:64002 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752367Ab1KNTbN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:31:13 -0500 From: Maciej Rutecki Reply-To: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com To: Natanji Subject: Re: Regression in thinkpad-acpi events Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:31:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4EBAC3B5.5060405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EBAC3B5.5060405@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <201111142031.06663.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On środa, 9 listopada 2011 o 19:17:25 Natanji wrote: > Hello everyone, > first time posting on this last, and I'm not subscribed, so please CC > any replies to me. ;) > > I'm running Kernel version 3.1-4 using Arch Linux (32 Bit) on a Thinkpad > X60 Tablet. Since upgrading from a pre-3.1 kernel to a post-3.1 kernel, > the Thinkpad-specific ACPI events (from thinkpad-acpi) are completely gone. > > This can be observed by using the acpi_listen command. For instance, no > ACPI events happen when swiveling the display, and the sleep button returns > button/sleep SBTN 00000080 00000000 > instead of the previous > ibm/hotkey HKEY 00000080 00001004 > > The bug was reported in the Arch Linux bugtracker [1] and it was > suggested to report this upstream, so this is what I did now. Sadly I > have no idea how I could find out if this is indeed a kernel bug or not; > I have never compiled my own kernel so what I can give you is probably > limited. But I suppose quite a few members of this list use a Thinkpad. > If there is anything else I can help out with, just tell me. > > [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=26658 Can you check that 3.1 works or not? Or try bisection that it is regression after 3.0 or 3.1 kernel. Regards -- Maciej Rutecki http://www.mrutecki.pl