From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752938Ab1K1L3j (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:29:39 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:53235 "EHLO earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752213Ab1K1L3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:29:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:30:56 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Airlie , Dave Airlie , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Message-ID: <20111128113056.2099e4c3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20111128135317.a99880b234c6c060a622fa31@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20111116113007.5656a7b4823ba085a46c57ae@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125124913.405fc8360a185f3116adb5ec@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125103011.18e167cd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20111128135317.a99880b234c6c060a622fa31@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:53:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:34:19 +0000 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I just pushed jbarnes patch into my tree for now, at pushed out the > > mainline gma500 code with it. > > And it is a mess (see my linux-next reports). Well its very hard to sort stuff out when you are juggling a cross tree set of dependancies and someone pointlessly stops one of them being visible in next for ten days. Whatever. I'm onto it, but I think blocking -next merges for staging breakage is broken to the point that -next needs fixing, or we should kill staging off. Alan